During 1939, Hitler was the major aggressor, whom everyone appeased, and who is notoriously known for his ascent to power, his persecution of Jews, and his assaults on the globe to control, which murdered so many people. The British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, believed in appeasement and appeased Hitler at the Munich Conference, which led to the outbreak of World War II.
In 1939, the world was thrown into World War II as appeasement failed and Hitler continued to grow to the point where no one could stop him. Overall, we were forced to enter WWII as a result of Hitler’s expansionist policies.
The most effective reaction to aggression is collective security, or a system in which states cooperate collectively to deter violence. Appeasements may and have been violated, and relying entirely on the word of an aggressor whose ambitions are driving his country into disarray is no guarantee of security.
There were multiple primary reasons of World War II. The effect of the Treaty of Versailles after WWI, the global economic downturn, the failure of appeasement, the growth of militarism in Germany and Japan, and the League of Nations’ failure are among them. German forces invaded Poland on September 1, 1939.
The Appeasement Policy failed to safeguard the countries it was supposed to protect: it failed to avert war. In 1936, for example, Britain and France enabled the remilitarization of the Rhineland without any country acting in what may have been avoided.
When Hitler came to power, he destroyed Germany’s democratic institutions and turned it into a war machine dedicated to conquering Europe for the sake of the so-called Aryan race. On September 1, 1939, his invasion of Poland began the European phase of World War II.
The most promising strategy to world peace is now recognized as collective security. In international relations, it is seen to be an effective tool for crisis management. Its purpose is to safeguard worldwide peace and security against conflict and invasion in any part of the globe.
Foreign policy aiming at pacifying a war-torn country via dialogue in order to avoid conflict. In the 1930s, British policy toward Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany was a perfect example.
Appeasement was seen to be advantageous since it gave the Allies more time to prepare for war. The assumption that the Munich Agreement restored peace, on the other hand, lulled the Allies into inaction since no one was properly prepared for war when it arrived.
https://bowie1983book.com/ will answer why was the world plunged into world war ii in 1939? what is the most effective response to aggression—appeasement or collective security?